2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
135
0
16

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
135
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…If the value of Pt. Measure Corr is positive, then the item tested is in accordance with the construct, whereas if the negative sign is in the value of Pt Measure Corr, then all items are misleading [24]. Value of Pt.…”
Section: Item Parameters Question Instrument Knowledge Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the value of Pt. Measure Corr is positive, then the item tested is in accordance with the construct, whereas if the negative sign is in the value of Pt Measure Corr, then all items are misleading [24]. Value of Pt.…”
Section: Item Parameters Question Instrument Knowledge Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 On the contrary, it has been documented that higher sample size might result in improved items' reliability when assessed through both factor and Rasch analyses. 14,27 The overall outcome of this dual validation approach resulted in a valid and reliable 21-items' PKA-PIUM scale for assessing patients' KAP on uncomplicated malaria. 14,28 The CTT results indicated validity of the instrument based on the convergent and discriminant validity and goodness-of-fit test results, 19,20,29 in addition, the Cronbach's alpha reliability of 0.74 (Table 2) to be within accepted limits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychometric analysis of the ISAT-Sp was carried out satisfactorily, according to the COSMIN standard [20]. In this regard, the ISAT-Sp showed satisfactory psychometric properties in reference to cross-cultural validity, internal consistency [23], and criterion validity [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%