1996
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Strength of Demographic Stochasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that we did not take into account demographic stochasticity in the model. Even though it is said to be less important than environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes (Sha¡er 1987), it is not to be neglected (Kokko & Ebenhard 1996), meaning that this simpli¢cation underestimates the risk that a group of a given size will be driven below the lower threshold. The results here can therefore be considered as optimistic, since environmental and demographic stochasticity will increase the risk of extinction and, therefore, the constraint of cooperative breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that we did not take into account demographic stochasticity in the model. Even though it is said to be less important than environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes (Sha¡er 1987), it is not to be neglected (Kokko & Ebenhard 1996), meaning that this simpli¢cation underestimates the risk that a group of a given size will be driven below the lower threshold. The results here can therefore be considered as optimistic, since environmental and demographic stochasticity will increase the risk of extinction and, therefore, the constraint of cooperative breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case the population is spatially structured, the risk of local extinctions can increase as a result of demographic stochasticity (Kokko and Ebenhard 1996). Spatially structured populations might be better modelled with spatially explicit models (Lande 1993, Kokko et al 1999), when such data are available.…”
Section: Checklistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The life history of a species, defined as the time, duration and magnitude of important life cycle processes such as growth, reproduction and mortality (Stearns ), greatly influences vulnerability to demographic stochasticity (Kokko & Ebenhard ; Jeppsson & Forslund ), as well as transient dynamics (Koons et al . ; Koons, Grand & Arnold ; Stott et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%