1999
DOI: 10.1080/10510979909388499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
385
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(406 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
19
385
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This construct refers specifically to when a person is unable to predict or describe his/her own behavior or attitudes. Knobloch and Solomon (1999) created scales to specifically address this characteristic in the context of a romantic relationship. This 19-item measure attempts to represent 3 areas of an individual's self uncertainty about a relationship in 3 subscales, which include his/her desire for the relationship, evaluation of its worth, and goals for its progression (SUS; .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construct refers specifically to when a person is unable to predict or describe his/her own behavior or attitudes. Knobloch and Solomon (1999) created scales to specifically address this characteristic in the context of a romantic relationship. This 19-item measure attempts to represent 3 areas of an individual's self uncertainty about a relationship in 3 subscales, which include his/her desire for the relationship, evaluation of its worth, and goals for its progression (SUS; .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belirsizliği açıklamak için kullanılan bir diğer kavram ise şüphe etmek ve/veya ön görememekdir. Knobloch ve Solomon (1999) belirsizliği kişiler arası ilişkilerde yaşanan şüphe olarak tanımlarken, Gudykunst (1993) kişilerin etkileşim anındayken kendisinin ya da diğer kişinin davranışlarını öngörememesi ya da anlamlandıramaması durumu olarak tanımlar. Ek olarak, bazı tanımlar belirsizliği varolan anlamın kaybı ile açıklarken (ör., "hayatın amacının, yönünün ve anlamının kaybolduğu algısı" (Sedikides, De Cremer, Hart ve Brebels, 2010, s.143)), bazı tanımlar da gelecekte karşılaşılabilecek olasılıklar üzerinden açıklar (ör., "potansiyel olarak zararlı bir olayla yüzleşmeden önceki bekleme süreci" (Monat, Averill ve Lazarus, 1972, s.237)).…”
Section: Belirsizlik Nedir?unclassified
“…İlk olarak belirsizlik kavramının hem yaşanan anda deneyimlediğimiz hem de gelecek ve olasılıkları içeren bir kavram olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Ayrıca belirsizlik farklı alanlarda deneyimlenebilir; belirsizlik yataran uyaran kişinin kendisiyle (Sedikides, De Cremer, Hart ve Brebels, 2010), diğer kişi(ler) ile olan ilişkileriyle (Knobloch ve Solomon, 1999) ve çevreyle (Kahneman ve Tversky, 1982) ilişkili olabilmektedir. Tüm bu tanımlardan yola çıkarak kapsayıcı bir tanım kullanmak adına, belirsizlik o an değerlendirilen uyarana ya da uyaranın gelecekteki olası sonuçlarına ilişkin algılanan farklılık olarak tanımlanabilir.…”
Section: Belirsizlik Nedir?unclassified
“…The first mechanism in the relational turbulence model is relational uncertainty, which refers to the degree of confidence people have in their perceptions of their involvement within interpersonal relationships (Knobloch & Solomon, 1999). Relational uncertainty is comprised of three interrelated sources of ambiguity that index doubts about one's own involvement in the relationship (self uncertainty), a partner's involvement in the relationship (partner uncertainty), and the future of the relationship more generally (relationship uncertainty).…”
Section: Relational Turbulence and The Empty-nest Phase Of Marriagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relational uncertainty is comprised of three interrelated sources of ambiguity that index doubts about one's own involvement in the relationship (self uncertainty), a partner's involvement in the relationship (partner uncertainty), and the future of the relationship more generally (relationship uncertainty). Although the three types of relational uncertainty reflect unique sources of ambiguity in close relationships and have occasionally produced divergent effects (e.g., Theiss & Solomon, 2006b), the vast majority of studies show that they are highly correlated (e.g., Knobloch & Solomon, 1999) and that typically all three types of uncertainty tend to be similarly associated with other variables (e.g., Knobloch & Theiss, 2011). Thus, in this study, we examine relational uncertainty as a broad construct that encompasses these three interrelated sources of doubt.…”
Section: Relational Turbulence and The Empty-nest Phase Of Marriagementioning
confidence: 99%