2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-08585-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
145
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
145
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also suggest a monotonic increase in k with x. The non-linear rate of increase illustrated in the computations of Figure 3d is consistent with previous experimental findings 15,21,22,35,42 , but a linear approximation is frequently invoked for the range of clinically relevant hydration levels. For example, in the linear fit shown in Figure 2c (red line), R 2 = 0.97 and the measured values of k are within 3% of linearly fitted values.…”
Section: Dðτþsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results also suggest a monotonic increase in k with x. The non-linear rate of increase illustrated in the computations of Figure 3d is consistent with previous experimental findings 15,21,22,35,42 , but a linear approximation is frequently invoked for the range of clinically relevant hydration levels. For example, in the linear fit shown in Figure 2c (red line), R 2 = 0.97 and the measured values of k are within 3% of linearly fitted values.…”
Section: Dðτþsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The thermal 21,22 and electrical properties 23 of skin both depend strongly on water content, but for different reasons. Consequently, devices that offer, in a single platform, capabilities for measuring both the thermal and the electrical characteristics of the skin provide improved insights into the state of hydration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the mechanical properties of skin vary with respect to different factors such as anatomical region, age, gender and individual phenotype (Escoffier et al, 1988;Cua et al, 1990;Agache et al, 2004;Gambichler et al, 2006). revealed that the Young modulus for stratum corneum of porcine skin was dependent upon the moisture content of the skin, ranging from 26 -120 MPa, for wet and dry skin, respectively.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelling (Fem) Modelling Of Mn Insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of unmodified Sylgard 184 has been reported to be 2.2 MPa [18] and 0.49 [19] respectively which lies within the range of reported elasticity for human skin of 1-4 MPa. [20] Using a Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) technique [21] the Young's modulus of all PDMS samples used was found to be 2.7 MPa with a loss tangent, tan δ, of 0.11 for the test conditions employed. The specific surface energy of adhesion, Δγ, between glass and PDMS was found to be 0.0356 J/m 2 .…”
Section: Contacting Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%