2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7218(10)02008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Returns to R&D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
192
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 505 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
13
192
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…innovation output and economic performance). 4 Hall and Van Reenen (2000), Parsons and Phillips (2007), Mohnen and Lokshin (2009), Hall et al (2009) andYang (2011) were the survey papers of direct relevance that we found and that we used during the search process.…”
Section: Data and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…innovation output and economic performance). 4 Hall and Van Reenen (2000), Parsons and Phillips (2007), Mohnen and Lokshin (2009), Hall et al (2009) andYang (2011) were the survey papers of direct relevance that we found and that we used during the search process.…”
Section: Data and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Consistent with previous findings, social returns on investment in innovation tend to be higher than the opportunity costs (returns on physical capital). For developed economies, social rates of return to R&D have been estimated at 40 percent or more (Hall, Mairesse, and Mohnen, 2009). In addition to generating new knowledge, investments in innovation also have a direct effect on creating absorptive capacity.…”
Section: Innovation and Knowledge As Keys To Productivity Growth And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between expected costs and RD&D investment was tested both using a log-log specification, usually applied in the learning-by-searching literature, and a linear specification with a squared RD&D term, in line with the literature on diminishing marginal returns to RD&D investments (Evenson & Kislev, 1976;Hall, Mairesse, & Mohnen, 2009;Popp, 2002).…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Expert Elicitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%