1994
DOI: 10.1108/14635779410056895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Quality of Services

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Satisfaction levels were scored against 12 performance criteria that PWD had long defined although not applied. While not as sophisticated as some performance measurement systems (Hoxley, 2000; Kaplan and Norton, 1992; Lee and Howard, 1994), the organisational impact of this exercise was profound. Respondents were given the opportunity to assess up to four QS consultants of their own choice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfaction levels were scored against 12 performance criteria that PWD had long defined although not applied. While not as sophisticated as some performance measurement systems (Hoxley, 2000; Kaplan and Norton, 1992; Lee and Howard, 1994), the organisational impact of this exercise was profound. Respondents were given the opportunity to assess up to four QS consultants of their own choice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%