2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the quality of diff algorithms: a formalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach is empirical, analyzing particular computer resources usage through space and time efficiency (or space complexity, the memory required). Objective and informative metrics should accompany each approach [ 2 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is empirical, analyzing particular computer resources usage through space and time efficiency (or space complexity, the memory required). Objective and informative metrics should accompany each approach [ 2 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, propose to introduce a new set of edit operations: 'split' of markup and (in the opposite case) 'join' to deal with such cases. A few studies have examined how we can keep track of changes in markup of data-centric and text-centric XML (Barabucci et al, 2016;Ciancarini et al, 2016), but comparing transcriptions of literary texts on the level of the text as well as the markup presents a number of compelling challenges. A simple example is the presentation of a user's edit operations.…”
Section: Editorial Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the outstanding advances in software engineering, existing difference-based approaches still have a number of limitations [40] as they lack the capability of providing efficient two-way comparison between the different revisions. Difference engines may make mistakes by displaying false-negative or false-positive correspondences, as we have previously seen it in this paper and as confirmed in [41] .…”
Section: Evolution Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%