Measuring the perceived quality of an AR-based learning application: a multidimensional model

Pribeanu, Costin; Balog, Alexandru; Iordache, Dragoş Daniel

doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1143375

Cited by 44 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For all the factors of MAUS, CITUS, and BLS all standardized factor loadings were statistically significant and were higher than the threshold of 0.70, which indicate a good validity. The item reliability values were higher than the suggested standard of 0.4 [54], except for COL4, SANM3, and CINTU5, thus indicating item reliabilities were acceptable. The composite reliability (CR) of each the factors of MAUS, CITUS, and BLS were above the threshold of 0.70, ranging from 0.80 to 0.94 for the factors of MAUS and 0.90 for CITUS and 0.86 for BLS which implied that the items are sufficiently representative on their respective construct.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirliğini ve Kullanımını İncelemek İçin Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Güler

2019

Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to adapt the mobile application usability scale to the Turkish culture and test its nomological network within a structural measuring model. The model is based on the technology acceptance model. Considering the relationships between usability perceptions, continued intention to use, brand loyalty and actual use of mobile applications of the users, these four variables were included in the model. The study was conducted on 476 participants. Translation of the scales, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability tests were conducted to test the validity and reliability of the scales. The original construct of the three scales validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were high or at least acceptable for all constructs. Fit indexes of the model indicated that the model remains within the acceptable limits. Relationships between usability, continued intention to use, brand loyalty and actual use were validated with the sample data.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

“…As it is stated in the related literature, continued intention to use is affected by usability [11,33,[49][50][51]. People may tend to use the applications that do not require much time and effort to learn and use [7,11,[52][53][54][55]. This tendency may have an important role on their continued intention to use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirliğini ve Kullanımını İncelemek İçin Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Güler

2019

Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[9] assed effect of delay time when visualization the object and the haptic delay on perception of difficulty when using Augmented Reality application, 14 participants were asked to wrap a virtual spring in Visio-haptic setting to choose which one they supposed as stiffer. Similar method to evaluate was done by Pribeanu et al [10] their questionaries' measured user three points of quality: (1) Ergonomic Quality(EQ), how easy to understand , learn and remember the application. 2Learning Quality (LQ), measures perceived efficiency (PEF).…”

Section: Discusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability testing method in augmented reality application

Pranoto

Tho

Warnars

et al. 2017

2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation on system or software is important thing to do, when developing a software or system. This step will ensures yours developed system or software has high quality in functionality or non-functionality needs. Several methods can be used to evaluate the Augmented Reality application: subjective measurement using human perception or objective measure from observation, or evaluation by expert through cognitive walkthrough, heuristic evaluation, lab observation, and questionnaire. An evaluation is more valid if evaluation was done in multiple methods in order to confirm the result of evaluation.

show abstract

“…According to research in multiple fields, for example education [4,5], marketing [6], entertainment [7], and healthcare [8], has shown that the use of immersive technologies enhances learning experiences [9], fosters participation in collaborative activity [10], and increases creativity and engagement [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A debate about implementing immersive technology for higher education: Pre-study examining the usability of virtual reality for lectures

Hopp

Pfiel

Schuster

et al. 2020

HSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: As the COVID-pandemic has shown, the need for innovative (digitalized) solutions is in high demand across almost every field of interest. The implementation of advanced technologies in higher education provides an intriguing opportunity to expand its scope by reaching new audiences as well as ensuring a high quality of learning outcome. OBJECTIVE: In this article we tried to examine if virtual reality can be a suitable option by placing lectures into a virtual setup. METHODS: First, we explored the theoretical background if and how virtual reality has been adapted for usage in higher education. We then asked five lecturers from the IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems to test a virtual environment (Mozilla Hubs) and evaluate the platform for their teaching purposes. RESULTS: Among one of the results was, that 80 percent would recommend using the platform for lectures to their colleagues. Due to the small sample size the findings need to be further evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In the foreseeable future virtual reality will become a valuable teaching assistance in higher education. Findings show that the response rate when training with virtual reality applications is much higher than to common studying methods.

show abstract

Measuring the perceived quality of an AR-based learning application: a multidimensional model

Cited by 44 publications

References 35 publications

Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirliğini ve Kullanımını İncelemek İçin Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirliğini ve Kullanımını İncelemek İçin Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Usability testing method in augmented reality application

A debate about implementing immersive technology for higher education: Pre-study examining the usability of virtual reality for lectures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About