1993
DOI: 10.2307/1164345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Outcomes of LEP Programs: Test Scores, Exit Rates, and Other Mythological Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…California Education Code § 313(d) stipulates the use ofmultiple criteria in determining whether to reclassify a child from ELL to R-FEP status, but each district in California ultimately determines its own criteria for reclassification (cf., Gandara & Merino, 1993;Linquanti, 2001). The criteria suggested by the state include, but are not limited to, California English Language Development Test (CELDT) scores, teacher evaluations, parental opinion, and a comparison ofbasic skills relative to those of English-proficient students of the same age, interpreted by districts as standardized test scores on an assessment of English language arts (i.e., the California Standards Test [CST] of English Language Arts [CST-ELA]V Along with CST-ELA scores, some districts (but not the one studied here) also consider CST mathematics scores.…”
Section: Reclassification Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…California Education Code § 313(d) stipulates the use ofmultiple criteria in determining whether to reclassify a child from ELL to R-FEP status, but each district in California ultimately determines its own criteria for reclassification (cf., Gandara & Merino, 1993;Linquanti, 2001). The criteria suggested by the state include, but are not limited to, California English Language Development Test (CELDT) scores, teacher evaluations, parental opinion, and a comparison ofbasic skills relative to those of English-proficient students of the same age, interpreted by districts as standardized test scores on an assessment of English language arts (i.e., the California Standards Test [CST] of English Language Arts [CST-ELA]V Along with CST-ELA scores, some districts (but not the one studied here) also consider CST mathematics scores.…”
Section: Reclassification Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The claim for 'regular' education status is also supported by the absence of an exit process whereby an ELL is reclassified as fluent English proficient and is required to leave their specialized program. The intake Á program placement Á exit process is integral to most programs for ELLs (de Jong 2004;Gándara and Merino 1993;Linquanti 2001). Within the traditional, remedial framework, long-term student participation in the program is seen as a disadvantage for linguistic and social development and perceived as 'languishing' in a segregated program (Krashen 2001).…”
Section: Two-way Immersion (Twi) Programs and Alternative Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further complicating the issue, ELL status correlates highly with a number of non-language related factors, including poverty (Ragan & Lesaux, 2006) and exposure to substandard resources (Gándara, Rumberger, Maxwell-Jolly, & Callahan, 2003). ELL identification processes then vary not only across schools, districts and states 2 , but also across the academic career of the individual student (Gándara & Merino, 1993; Linquanti, 2001; Ragan & Lesaux, 2006). The lack of a uniform definition of ELL is but one factor that may contribute to the lower educational achievement of language minority students (August & Hakuta, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%