Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/764/1/58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Mass Distribution in Galaxy Clusters

Abstract: Cluster mass profiles are tests of models of structure formation. Only two current observational methods of determining the mass profile, gravitational lensing, and the caustic technique are independent of the assumption of dynamical equilibrium. Both techniques enable the determination of the extended mass profile at radii beyond the virial radius. For 19 clusters, we compare the mass profile based on the caustic technique with weak lensing measurements taken from the literature. This comparison offers a test… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
84
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(154 reference statements)
10
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose this sample size as it reflects the scale of data we have today for measuring both weak-lensing profiles and also with significant spectroscopic follow-up [40][41][42].…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this sample size as it reflects the scale of data we have today for measuring both weak-lensing profiles and also with significant spectroscopic follow-up [40][41][42].…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we decided to consider only the caustic technique with F β = 0.5 (the same value has been recently adopted by Geller et al 2013). Given that for r s < r < 4r s ≈ r 200 one can approximate F β cst typically to ±11% accuracy, the mass profile returned by the caustic method changes normalization but not the shape for different values of F β .…”
Section: Practical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, and in contrast to the latter, caustics are not affected by the correlated large-scale structures along the line of sight (Diaferio 1999;Serra et al 2011;Geller et al 2013) because removing background/foreground at Δv > 3000 km s −1 is straightforward with spectroscopy that is needed anyway for caustics. This is magnificently illustrated by the cluster pair MS0906.5+1110/Abell 750: these clusters are offset by only 3000 km s −1 and are almost on the same line of sight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%