2009
DOI: 10.1134/s0020441209060177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the lasing threshold of a passively Q-switched diode-pumped pulsed solid-state laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(12). For β = 10 −15 , the times τ inY and τ inC for the YAG:Nd and CGGG:Nd lasers [13], which are determined by the quantum fluctuations of spontaneous emission, are 15 and 31 ns, respectively, which is higher than the pulse interval jitter of the diode-pumped solid-state laser considered in [16] by three orders of magnitude. The latter circumstance shows the necessity to allow for the influence of the quantum fluctuations of spontaneous emission on the laser pulse-interval stability during the laser-parameter optimization.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Spontaneous-emission Factormentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(12). For β = 10 −15 , the times τ inY and τ inC for the YAG:Nd and CGGG:Nd lasers [13], which are determined by the quantum fluctuations of spontaneous emission, are 15 and 31 ns, respectively, which is higher than the pulse interval jitter of the diode-pumped solid-state laser considered in [16] by three orders of magnitude. The latter circumstance shows the necessity to allow for the influence of the quantum fluctuations of spontaneous emission on the laser pulse-interval stability during the laser-parameter optimization.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Spontaneous-emission Factormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the CGGG:Nd laser [13], similar quantities are equal to n C = 2.0 · 10 20 cm −3 , τ C = 220 μs, σ C = 1.4 · 10 −19 cm 2 , and d C = 1.5 mm, respectively. The effective diameter D of the mode in an active element is the same and equals 90 μm for both lasers [13]. For n a = 1.5, q = 1, β = 10 −5 [11], and the inverted population density n i , which is equal to the neodymium-ion concentration, we obtain τ inY = 1.5 · 10 −13 s and τ inC = 3.1 · 10 −13 s. The 586 obtained values for τ inY and τ inC are smaller than the typical values of pulse interval jitter for the YAG:Nd and CGGG:Nd lasers [14] by several orders and seem to be the lowest possible jitter for these devices.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations