2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04401-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the interdisciplinarity of Information and Library Science interactions using citation analysis and semantic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While numerous studies have explored citation network analysis across various contemporary scientific disciplines over the past decades [ 23 , 35 , 36 ], its application in the humanities and historical corpora has been relatively limited [ 37 39 ]. Additionally, those studies have a predominant focus on several key areas: (i) Comparisons of the humanities to other disciplines in terms of growth timeframes, internationality, and interconnectivity [ 37 ]; (ii) exploration of the potentially problematic role of bibliometrics in performance evaluation within the humanities [ 40 , 41 ]; (iii) mapping the cognitive and social structure of the humanities, such as understanding the relationships among various disciplines and sub-disciplines in institutional frameworks and personal relations [ 19 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numerous studies have explored citation network analysis across various contemporary scientific disciplines over the past decades [ 23 , 35 , 36 ], its application in the humanities and historical corpora has been relatively limited [ 37 39 ]. Additionally, those studies have a predominant focus on several key areas: (i) Comparisons of the humanities to other disciplines in terms of growth timeframes, internationality, and interconnectivity [ 37 ]; (ii) exploration of the potentially problematic role of bibliometrics in performance evaluation within the humanities [ 40 , 41 ]; (iii) mapping the cognitive and social structure of the humanities, such as understanding the relationships among various disciplines and sub-disciplines in institutional frameworks and personal relations [ 19 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it is not very effective in handling dynamic short texts and can be slow in training on large datasets [22]. Furthermore, it struggles to identify relationships between topics [23]. The model's generalization ability, accuracy, and interpretability of results are challenged [4].…”
Section: A Topic Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the interdisciplinarity of the working groups' collaborations, we analysed the literature on which the group drew to produce their published articles, the 'inspiration' measure of [9] and used by several authors in whole or in part as a measure of interdisciplinarity [33,[70][71][72]. Specifically, we examined the disciplinarity diversity of the cited journals [76,73].…”
Section: Collation Of Articles Used and Producedmentioning
confidence: 99%