2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04350-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the innovation of method knowledge elements in scientific literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chinese LIS research Jarvelin and Vakkari (1990) extracted research methods in academic papers using content analysis, and Pan et al (2015) adopted a bootstrapped learning method to automatically extract software entities. Some knowledge entity studies have used research method extraction algorithms, software and datasets to evaluate the influence of knowledge elements (Tuarob et al, 2016;Wang and Zhang, 2020;Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Knowledge Extraction Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Chinese LIS research Jarvelin and Vakkari (1990) extracted research methods in academic papers using content analysis, and Pan et al (2015) adopted a bootstrapped learning method to automatically extract software entities. Some knowledge entity studies have used research method extraction algorithms, software and datasets to evaluate the influence of knowledge elements (Tuarob et al, 2016;Wang and Zhang, 2020;Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Knowledge Extraction Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2.2 Baselines. For comparison, several representative models were selected as baselines on the dataset used in this paper, including W2V-BiLSTM-CRF, Glove-BiLSTM-CRF, Text-CNN, SCI-BERT, and Rule-based method by Wang et al (2022). Among them, W2V-BiLSTM-CRF and Glove-BiLSTM-CRF use LSTM as the feature extractor, biphasic recurrent neural networks to combine pre and post-text related information, and CRF as the output layer, which is a CRF commonly used in NLP tasks to solve sequence annotation problems.…”
Section: Knowledge Extraction In Chinese Lis Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations