The Asian ‘Poverty Miracle’ 2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781785369155.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the impact of vulnerability on the number of poor: a new methodology with empirical illustrations

Abstract: The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI's working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13. For a recent study of vulnerability, see Chakravarty et al 2015. 14. There are, for example, issues concerned with the comparability of scales across individuals (see Ravallion, Himelein, and Beegle 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. For a recent study of vulnerability, see Chakravarty et al 2015. 14. There are, for example, issues concerned with the comparability of scales across individuals (see Ravallion, Himelein, and Beegle 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such circumstances it may not be unreasonable to identify those rich individuals as not vulnerable to poverty. To identify the vulnerable, recent studies such as Dang and Lanjouw (2017), Chakravarty et al (2016) and de la Fuente et al ( 2015) have considered a vulnerability line, which is similar in concept to a poverty line. However, this approach operationalises the vulnerability line using ex post data, where we have to know the future income to set the vulnerability line, and thus ignores the ex ante nature of vulnerability.…”
Section: Identification Of the Vulnerablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful identification of relatively poor households in academics is still in its early stages and follows two basic paradigms, one from a welfare viewpoint, establishing a percentage of median or average income as the relative poverty level, and the other from a socioeconomic perspective (Ravallion and Chen, 2011;Chakravarty et al, 2016). The viability perspective of poverty is another relative poverty identification paradigm, which contends that relative poverty criteria should detect whether persons lack the potential to survive and socially integrate (Bourguignon and Atkinson, 2000).…”
Section: Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%