2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the impact of market competition analysis process in EU׳s electronic communications sector: Catalyst or impediment towards market competition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the overwhelming evidence of positive impacts of the broadband technologies and the indubitable opportunities of business in this sector, the regulation of this and related markets became essential. For example, Polykalas and Prezarakos (2015) verified that the Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications promotes competition in the EU. In a theoretical and insightful work, Haucap and Klein (2012) proved that network regulation negatively affects investment incentives in the network market; however, the effects on investment in complementary services can be either negative or positive depending on the weight assigned by consumers to infrastructure vs service quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the overwhelming evidence of positive impacts of the broadband technologies and the indubitable opportunities of business in this sector, the regulation of this and related markets became essential. For example, Polykalas and Prezarakos (2015) verified that the Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications promotes competition in the EU. In a theoretical and insightful work, Haucap and Klein (2012) proved that network regulation negatively affects investment incentives in the network market; however, the effects on investment in complementary services can be either negative or positive depending on the weight assigned by consumers to infrastructure vs service quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%