2016
DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1111052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interprofessional collaboration has been promoted as an effective avenue to enhance the delivery of patient care [4][5][6]. However, the challenges of ensuring collaboration among team members in mental health are well testified [3,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interprofessional collaboration has been promoted as an effective avenue to enhance the delivery of patient care [4][5][6]. However, the challenges of ensuring collaboration among team members in mental health are well testified [3,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interprofessional collaboration in the field is thus hampered by strong uniprofessional cultures, a diversity of approaches to the care and treatment of patients, and conflict over leadership [3,[7][8][9]. Interprofessional education (IPE) nevertheless continues to be invoked by policymakers as an effective method to improve collaboration [4,6], and calls for its wider implementation across educational and clinical settings are frequently heard [10][11][12]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines IPE: "(…) students from two or more professions learn [ing] about, from and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes" [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another identified weakness was the lack of sufficient information regarding the impact of our IPE activities on achieving the different student educational outcomes in relation to interprofessional care. More assessment studies looking at both short- and long-term outcomes of IPE activities including important impact on practice and resultant patient care are warranted and indeed, now strongly advocated by the Institute of Medicine [23]. The disparate location of participating academic institutions on five different campuses was also problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has yielded valuable information on the design of the instruments and the processes of group feedback and individual reflective debriefings using video recordings of practice. Self-reporting is at the centre of this small study but future research needs to be more specifically linked to patient-related impact and outcomes to ensure that patient safety is at the heart of the IPE training objectives and there have been recent calls for such strengthening of the evidence base of IPE research (see Cox et al, 2016). Also, that the concepts of teamwork and communication between professionals within any IPE implementation are consistent with new GMC standards for medical education and training (GMC, 2015) The simulator environment was good at getting the two professions to work together…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%