2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10199-011-0012-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Harm of Illicit Drug Use on Friends and Family

Abstract: AIMS This paper explores different approaches to quantify the human costs related to drug use. DATA AND METHODS The data come from a representative survey of 3092 respondents above the age of 18 in four Nordic capitals: Copenhagen, Helsinki, Oslo and Stockholm. Results The results show that in most Nordic capitals more than half of the respondents at some time have known and worried about the drug use of somebody they know personally. Moreover, while the average reported harm was about 2 on a scale from 0 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We were interested in mapping to what extent relatives' and intimate friends' alcohol problems may affect the respondents' life negatively. For this purpose we asked: ‘To what extent would you say that your mother's/father's or present/previous partner's or other intimate friend's/relative's alcohol use has influenced your life during the last 12 months?’ The respondents were asked to estimate this impact on a scale running from 0 to 10, ‘0’ implying that no harmful impact is experienced, while ‘10’ represented a situation where the harm from others' alcohol problems ‘has ruined my life’ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were interested in mapping to what extent relatives' and intimate friends' alcohol problems may affect the respondents' life negatively. For this purpose we asked: ‘To what extent would you say that your mother's/father's or present/previous partner's or other intimate friend's/relative's alcohol use has influenced your life during the last 12 months?’ The respondents were asked to estimate this impact on a scale running from 0 to 10, ‘0’ implying that no harmful impact is experienced, while ‘10’ represented a situation where the harm from others' alcohol problems ‘has ruined my life’ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little research has been conducted to address this topic in recent years. While harm from others’ illegal drug use has been widely studied in some subgroups of the population, e.g., the consequences of substance use during pregnancy and parental substance use (e.g., Imer, Teasdale, Nielsen, Vedal, & Olofsoson, 2012 ; Nygaard, Slinning, Moe, & Walhovd, 2016 ; Raitasalo, Holmlia, Autti-Rämö, Notkola, & Rapanainen, 2015 ; Reitan, 2018 ), the research addressing self-reported harm from others’ illegal drug use on a population level in the Nordic countries is scarce (but see Melberg et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Previous Research On Harm From Others’ Substance Use In the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survey research on harm from others’ substance use consists of two research traditions. The first focuses on concrete incidents of harm from others’ alcohol use ( Casswell, You, & Huckle, 2011 ; Laslett et al, 2011 ; Lund et al, 2016 ; Mäkelä et al, 1999 ; Moan et al, 2015 ; Rossow & Hauge, 2004 ; Storvoll et al, 2016 ), cigarette smoking (e.g., Sivri, Lazuras, Rodafinos, & Eiser, 2013 ) and illegal drug use ( Melberg et al, 2011 ). Examples of harms assessed within the first tradition are whether the respondents have been physically harmed by, whether they had been afraid of, or verbally abused by people who had been drinking.…”
Section: Previous Research On Harm From Others’ Substance Use In the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the same age group in Nordic countries, lifetime prevalence of cannabis use is 36.5% in Denmark, 16.2% in Norway, 14.3% in Finland, and 12.5% in Sweden [2]. In response, many countries have initiated drug treatment programmes to counter negative health and social consequences of illicit drug use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%