1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00745.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Extent of Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Major American Newspapers: A Content Analysis

Abstract: n i s study describes a content analysis of 14 American newspapers over an 8-week period, which measured the extent to which potentially prejudicial statements identijiied in the American Bar Association (ABA, 1983) Model Rules are reported in news stories about crime and criminal defendants. n e sources through which such publicity reaches the press were also examined. Results indicated that over one quarter of the suspects described in crime stories are identijiied in connection with information specificall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportional reduction of error technique used in this study to assess coder consistency relied on the index I r (Imrich, Mullin, & Linz, 1995;Perreault & Leigh, 1989). This index compares the observed frequency of agreement between judges to an expected frequency of agreement given some "true" level of reliability for the coding process.…”
Section: Measuring Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportional reduction of error technique used in this study to assess coder consistency relied on the index I r (Imrich, Mullin, & Linz, 1995;Perreault & Leigh, 1989). This index compares the observed frequency of agreement between judges to an expected frequency of agreement given some "true" level of reliability for the coding process.…”
Section: Measuring Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportional reduction of error technique used in this study to assess coder consistency relied on the index I r (Imrich, Mullin, & Linz, 1995;Perreault & Leigh, 1989). This index compares the observed frequency of agreement between judges to an expected frequency of agreement given some "true" level of reliability for the coding process.…”
Section: Measuring Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that pretrial publicity (defined as "potentially prejudicial information" by the American Bar Association [ABA]) accompanies 19% of news reports, and given that Latinos and African Americans are twice as likely to be the target of prejudicial statements (Dixon & Linz, 2002), reasonable concern might be raised about the influence of such pretrial publicity. Indeed, using the ABA definition, research by Imrich, Mullin, and Linz (1995) found that 27% of the pretrial publicity descriptions reviewed in 14 newspapers over an 8-week period were "problematic." For many years, opinion on the issue was relatively undivided, and researchers concluded that pretrial publicity adversely affects the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial.…”
Section: Communication and The Lawmentioning
confidence: 98%