Measuring the Diversity of Facebook Reactions to Research

Abstract

Online and in the real world, communities are bonded together by emotional consensus around core issues. Emotional responses to scientific findings often play a pivotal role in these core issues. When there is too much diversity of opinion on topics of science, emotions flare up and give rise to conflict. This conflict threatens positive outcomes for research. Emotions have the power to shape how people process new information. They can color the public's understanding of science, motivate policy positions, even change lives. And yet little work has been done to evaluate the public's emotional response to science using quantitative methods. In this paper, we use a dataset of responses to scholarly articles on Facebook to analyze the dynamics of emotional valence, intensity, and diversity. We present a novel way of weighting click-based reactions that increases their comprehensibility, and use these weighted reactions to develop new metrics of aggregate emotional responses. We use our metrics along with LDA topic models and statistical testing to investigate how users' emotional responses differ from one scientific topic to another. We find that research articles related to gender, genetics, or agricultural/environmental sciences elicit significantly different emotional responses from users than other research topics. We also find that there is generally a positive response to scientific research on Facebook, and that articles generating a positive emotional response are more likely to be widely shared-a conclusion that contradicts previous studies of other social media platforms.

An exploratory study of social media users’ engagement with COVID-19 vaccine-related content

“…In contrast to the idea of basic emotions, the circumplex model of affect proposes that human emotion is more complex and diverse than the basic emotion theory explains ( Russell, 1980 ). At least 28 interconnected emotional states of humans can be defined with two variables: emotional valence or sentiment and emotional arousal or intensity ( Citron et al , 2014 ; Freeman et al ., 2020 ; Yang & Chen, 2012 ). This two-dimensional model of human emotions defines emotional valence as positive and negative and emotional arousal as high and low ( Preoţiuc-Pietro et al , 2016 ).…”

Audience engagement when disseminating livestock information through infographics on social media

“…However, the majority of reactions observed across all posts and livestock species were positive (e.g., Likes and Loves). Freeman et al (2020) also reported that uncontroversial scientific findings shared on Facebook yielded a greater number of Likes than other reactions.…”

Quantifying the online long-term interest in research

“…The impact of research on society is increasingly being considered by research communities (Samuel and Derrick, 2015;Bornmann, 2013;Shaikh and Alhoori, 2019). Additionally, a growing amount of scholarly content is shared and discussed on social media platforms on a daily basis (Ding et al, 2009;Fausto et al, 2012;Freeman et al, 2020Freeman et al, , 2019. The number of research articles shared on these platforms is estimated to be increasing at a rate of 5-10% per month (Adie and Roe, 2013).…”