2010 Fifth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icdim.2010.5664223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the credibility of Arabic text content in Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we still haven't seen a decisive work that could establish a systematic credibility metric in OSNs to detect and evaluate misinformation that integrates reliability and reputation, though most of the research provides a good foundation for future efforts. In principle, future work should include extending experiments to larger datasets and partial datasets; some studies used small datasets [29], [57], [59], [72], [81], [133], [143]. Other open problems include assessing the credibility of target pages to which URLs redirect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we still haven't seen a decisive work that could establish a systematic credibility metric in OSNs to detect and evaluate misinformation that integrates reliability and reputation, though most of the research provides a good foundation for future efforts. In principle, future work should include extending experiments to larger datasets and partial datasets; some studies used small datasets [29], [57], [59], [72], [81], [133], [143]. Other open problems include assessing the credibility of target pages to which URLs redirect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the post level, the task is to analyze the content attributes of a tweet to assess its credibility score and determine whether it is trustworthy [51], [52]. Research on this topic is divided into offline systematization of already present input [29], [53]- [57] and real-time systems that use only the data accessible in each post (not considering complete historical, user, or topic data) [58]- [61]. Starting from tweet attributes, characteristics like total # if characters in the tweet, total # of words it contains, total # of questions, and total # of uppercase characters are computed.…”
Section: A Post Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present assessment focuses on filtering Arabic content on Twitter, whereas most research on this topic has focused on the English language, which uses the Roman alphabet. Al-Eidan et al [17] provided two methods with the aim of evaluating Arabic content; the first of these proposed systems applies "the similarity between Twitter posts and authentic news sources, while the second approach uses a set of proposed features" [17]. These techniques sound similar to the approach proposed by Sriram et al [14] with classes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, we gather features from 17 different papers, some of which we have already discussed. We gather features from works that use classifiers to automatically predict credibility [8,50,21,28,49,9,16,15,7], features from works that use learning to rank algorithms [18,17], and features gleaned from works that take hybrid or other appraoches to quantify and model credibility [40,24,45,1,42,3]. In Table 2.…”
Section: Popular Features From Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%