1996
DOI: 10.1139/f95-046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the bioenergetic cost of fish activity in situ using a globally dispersed radiotracer (137Cs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If species from a wider geographical range were included, even larger variability could be expected. The estimated elimination rates deviated from the predictions of the caesium elimination model by Rowan & Rasmussen (1995), a model assumed to have high generality (Rowan & Rasmussen 1996), and from the brown trout model of Ugedal et al (1 992). Therefore, the aim of developing one general model for caesium elimination with high enough precision for the whole range of ecotoxicological models or tracer studies may be abandoned.…”
Section: E V a L U A T I O N O F R E S U L T Smentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If species from a wider geographical range were included, even larger variability could be expected. The estimated elimination rates deviated from the predictions of the caesium elimination model by Rowan & Rasmussen (1995), a model assumed to have high generality (Rowan & Rasmussen 1996), and from the brown trout model of Ugedal et al (1 992). Therefore, the aim of developing one general model for caesium elimination with high enough precision for the whole range of ecotoxicological models or tracer studies may be abandoned.…”
Section: E V a L U A T I O N O F R E S U L T Smentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, the variation in caesium elimination shown does not discredit the use of the Rowan & Rasmussen (1995) model in ecotoxicological and tracer studies. For many fish species, this model provides a good approximation of the caesium elimination and can be used to estimate food consumption and fish activity (Rowan & Rasmussen 1996), for example, or in models of caesium turnover. Sensitivity analyses have shown that neither caesium-based estimates of fish activity (Rowan & Rasmussen 1996) nor estimates of fish caesium accumulation (Ugedal, Forseth & Jonsson 1997) are particularly sensitive to variation in caesium elimination estimates, compared with the sensitivity to variation in, for example, assimilation efficiency.…”
Section: M P L I C a T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations