2021
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Acetabular Index: An Accurate and Reliable Alternative Method of Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies revealed that DDH began with a shallow acetabulum and anteverted femur ( 8 , 42 ). Sherman et al found AI was an objective and preferred index for diagnosing hip dysplasia in children under eight ( 43 ). Davila-Parrilla et al observed AI was a reliable parameter for assessing acetabular morphology ( 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed that DDH began with a shallow acetabulum and anteverted femur ( 8 , 42 ). Sherman et al found AI was an objective and preferred index for diagnosing hip dysplasia in children under eight ( 43 ). Davila-Parrilla et al observed AI was a reliable parameter for assessing acetabular morphology ( 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three parameters, that is, AI, acetabular depth ratio A (ADR-A) (the depth ratio measured from the ischium), and acetabular depth ratio B (ADR-B) (the depth ratio measured from the pubic bone), were measured on each pelvic radiograph. [ 19 ] A single orthopedist surgeon with ten years of experience in pediatric orthopedic surgery (ASS) performed the AI and ADR measurements based on a standardized protocol described in the literature [ 1 , 22 ] (Fig. 2 A and B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 , 6 ] AI provides an objective parameter of acetabular dysplasia in terms of diagnosis and grading. [ 19 ] On the other hand, ADR has been proposed for the measurement of the width and depth of the acetabulum. [ 16 ] However, intra- and interobserver reliabilities of AI and ADR in evaluating the acetabular morphology have also been criticized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-ray film can dynamically observe the changes of bone structure during child growth and development, which is the most basic imaging method to evaluate the structural changes of the hip joint, and is important for guiding screening and evaluation of acetabular morphology[ 32 - 34 ]. The following are the main parameters in the evaluation of acetabular morphology by X-ray film[ 35 , 36 ]: Degree of acetabular anteversion, central edge angle (CEA), Acetabular index (AI), sharp angle, angle of iliac wall, and acetabular coverage. The normal acetabulum is usually tilted forward, and it is of clinical importance when the angle is increased by > 7° compared with normal[ 24 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Acetabular Morphology By X-ray Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%