2002
DOI: 10.3233/ida-2002-6303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the accuracy and interest of association rules: A new framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This property, that was proved for ARs in Berzal et al (2002) holds for ADs as well, as the following proposition shows:…”
Section: Definition 26mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This property, that was proved for ARs in Berzal et al (2002) holds for ADs as well, as the following proposition shows:…”
Section: Definition 26mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Despite it is the most employed, confidence is not a suitable accuracy measure for association rules, as pointed out by different authors (Brin et al 1997, Silverstein et al 1998, Berzal et al 2002. For instance, Piatetsky-Shapiro (1991) suggested that a suitable accuracy measure ACC for ADs should verify the following properties:…”
Section: An Alternative Accuracy Measurementioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations