2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the accuracies of motor unit firing times and action potential waveforms derived from surface electromyographic decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerous studies have calculated a high rate of agreement between the surface EMG signal decomposition method utilized in this study 66,67 and intramuscular MU firing times as done with other decomposition methods 68,69 . In addition, we utilized a three‐step, user‐driven validation process that allowed us to quantitatively ensure 31,33 our AP trains were reflecting MU activity 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, numerous studies have calculated a high rate of agreement between the surface EMG signal decomposition method utilized in this study 66,67 and intramuscular MU firing times as done with other decomposition methods 68,69 . In addition, we utilized a three‐step, user‐driven validation process that allowed us to quantitatively ensure 31,33 our AP trains were reflecting MU activity 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, a secondary STA procedure was performed to validate the firing times and action potential waveforms created via the PD III algorithm. The derived firing times from the PD III algorithm were used to STA the four raw EMG signals 17,31,32 . MUs were selected for analysis if they demonstrated high correlations ( r ≥ 0.7) across the four channels between the PD III algorithm and the STA derived action potential waveforms and a coefficient of variation for the STA derived peak‐to‐peak amplitudes <0.3 across time 17,31 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations