1996
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
245
0
17

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
245
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Within many economics and technology management disciplines, patent statistics have become well defined and established as a proxy factor for the measure of technological capacity and accepted as (albeit imperfect) statistics for innovation and R&D production in the absence of more robust measures [25][26][27]. Patent application and registration is also a system that companies and institutes use to perfect their technological innovations, and for legal reasons, patent-filing information is systematically registered by national government offices [28].…”
Section: Patent Statistics For Tlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within many economics and technology management disciplines, patent statistics have become well defined and established as a proxy factor for the measure of technological capacity and accepted as (albeit imperfect) statistics for innovation and R&D production in the absence of more robust measures [25][26][27]. Patent application and registration is also a system that companies and institutes use to perfect their technological innovations, and for legal reasons, patent-filing information is systematically registered by national government offices [28].…”
Section: Patent Statistics For Tlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, manufacturing employment is included to proxy agglomeration effects on knowledge production in an unspecified form. Patent count data are used as indicators of knowledge output despite their widely known drawbacks and problems (Basberg 1987;Pavitt 1988;Griliches 1990;Archibugi 1992;Archibugi and Pianta 1996;Fischer, Fröhlich and Gassler 1994).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to the more specific issue of international R&D collaboration, Archambault (2002, p. 21) argue that the largest advantage of tabulating statistics for every country that participates in inventions is the ability to identify trends in international collaboration: "… calculating data for multiple addresses … reveals the patterns of collaboration in technological development." Similarly, according to Archibugi and Pianta (1996) international collaborations are revealed in the rapid growth of patents with inventors from different countries. Examples of studies applying this indicator include Guellec and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie's (2001) study of European Patent Office patents with several inventors residing in different countries, Yamin and Otto's (2004) investigation of the collective knowledge sharing of 20 MNCs in the biopharmaceutical industry (in which they counted the share of patents with inventors in more than one country), a study by Frost and Zhou (2005) However, no evidence has been presented in the literature that cross-country patents are either truly international (i.e.…”
Section: Technological Internationalization By Mncs May Come In a Varmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Archibugi and Pianta, 1996;Archibugi and Pietrobelli, 2003;Lucena, 2005;Nummela, 2003). 6 5 According to some researchers, collaboration between domestic MNC units and foreign subsidiaries can be considered less international than collaboration involving only foreign units.…”
Section: What Characterizes 'Collaborative' Randd?mentioning
confidence: 99%