2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-015-9598-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring teachers’ knowledge of vocabulary development and instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, available studies have concentrated on code‐focused, reading‐related outcomes (e.g., print knowledge, phonological awareness, and word reading) rather than language outcomes, and the vast majority have utilized knowledge measures that emphasize orthography, phonology, morphology, or supporting code‐focused skills (cf. Duguay, Kenyon, Haynes, August, & Yanosky, ; Gersten et al, ). Given current challenges in facilitating educators' abilities to support young children's language development (Dickinson, ; Haley, Hulme, Bowyer‐Crane, Snowling, & Fricke, ), better understanding educators' knowledge regarding oral language and associations or lack thereof with children's language learning is an important avenue for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, available studies have concentrated on code‐focused, reading‐related outcomes (e.g., print knowledge, phonological awareness, and word reading) rather than language outcomes, and the vast majority have utilized knowledge measures that emphasize orthography, phonology, morphology, or supporting code‐focused skills (cf. Duguay, Kenyon, Haynes, August, & Yanosky, ; Gersten et al, ). Given current challenges in facilitating educators' abilities to support young children's language development (Dickinson, ; Haley, Hulme, Bowyer‐Crane, Snowling, & Fricke, ), better understanding educators' knowledge regarding oral language and associations or lack thereof with children's language learning is an important avenue for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were also asked to rank nine literacy concepts from most important to least important in the context of kindergarten literacy instruction. The lowest score out of the participants on the pilot TKVS conducted by Duguay et al (2016) was 31 out of 52 statements correct (59.6%), which is only slightly higher than the chance of…”
Section: Initial Interviewmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The final 52 items were chosen after reviewing feedback from the pilot cognitive lab and researchers removed any questions that were confusing or unclear. The TKVS items are listed in Appendix B Duguay et al (2016). reported the TKVS to be appropriate as a needs assessment for teachers or a guide for professional development in vocabulary instruction for teachers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For DCFs, the week began with a formative assessment of their knowledge of literacy instruction using the Teacher Knowledge of Vocabulary Survey (Duguay, Kenyon, Haynes, August, & Yanosky, 2016). This survey includes a section for background information and three sections with true/false questions: development of vocabulary knowledge (e.g., “Many words in English have multiple meanings”); knowledge of how to provide rich and varied language experiences (e.g., “Vocabulary can be acquired through incidental exposure”); and knowledge of how to foster word consciousness (e.g., “A single instance of a word in context is often sufficient to reveal its full meaning”).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%