Measuring Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Learner Language: Comparing the Incomparable?

Abstract

<jats:p>Spoken and written language are two modes of language. When learners aim at higher skill levels, the expected outcome of successful second language learning is usually to become a fluent speaker and writer who can produce accurate and complex language in the target language. There is an axiomatic difference between speech and writing, but together they form the essential parts of learners’ L2 skills. The two modes have their own characteristics, and there are differences between native and nonnative language use. For instance, hesitations and pauses are not visible in the end result of the writing process, but they are characteristic of nonnative spoken language use. The present study is based on the analysis of L2 English spoken and written productions of 18 L1 Finnish learners with focus on syntactic complexity. As earlier spoken language segmentation units mostly come from fluency studies, we conducted an experiment with a new unit, the U-unit, and examined how using this unit as the basis of spoken language segmentation affects the results. According to the analysis, written language was more complex than spoken language. However, the difference in the level of complexity was greatest when the traditional units, T-units and AS-units, were used in segmenting the data. Using the U-unit revealed that spoken language may, in fact, be closer to written language in its syntactic complexity than earlier studies had suggested. Therefore, further research is needed to discover whether the differences in spoken and written learner language are primarily due to the nature of these modes or, rather, to the units and measures used in the analysis.</jats:p>

A Syntactical Analysis of Fresh Graduates’ Job Interview Responses

“…The above studies concur with the findings of Singh and Shamsudin (2009); Housen et al (2012), Kuiken and Vedder (2012), Lintunen and Makila (2014), and Tuan (2017) that competence in grammar should be equally emphasised in spoken and written forms.…”

A Corpus-Based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Learner Language

“…It was also established that the use of that-clause as complement function and related pronouns was significantly more frequent in writing than in speaking. Taken together, it is generally agreed upon among scholars, that the use of more complex structures in writing than speaking is commonplace (Lintunen & Mäkilä, 2014). The reason for the difference between these two modes can be found in the developmental progression described in the Biber et al's (2011) study, although the type of participants and modes are not exactly comparable to the present study:…”

Word order in heritage Russian: clause type and majority language matter

“…Embedded clauses are often regarded to be an indicator of syntactic complexity (Sánchez Abchi & De Mier, 2017, for heritage Spanish; Levy et al, 2013, for relative clauses in monolingual Russian; Lintunen & Mäkilä, 2014, for L2 English by Finnish monolingual speakers). Besides, the processing of embedded clauses was found to be less accurate than the processing of main clauses (e.g., Baker & Wagner, 1987;Sanford, 2002).…”