Measuring Sustainable Indigenous Tourism Indicators: A Case of Mah Meri Ethnic Group in Carey Island, Malaysia

Abstract

Sustainable tourism emphasises responsible utilisation of economic, socio-cultural and environmental resources for tourism development. Extant literature in sustainable tourism leans towards subjective and qualitative description in explaining the dynamic nature of the trans-disciplinary indicators of sustainability. However, few mechanisms have been proposed or developed to quantify the indicators measuring sustainable tourism in an indigenous ethnic context. The current study measures 61 sustainable indigenous tourism indicators of the Mah Meri ethnic group that comprise three constructs, namely, community resources, community development and sustainable tourism. Simple random sampling was employed for data elicitation and a weighted average score using R software as the basis of analysis was used to produce a sustainable indigenous tourism barometer (SITB). The study identifies 11 sustainability dimensions from the initial three main constructs that are treated as the relationship aspects in this study. Based on the Sustainable Indigenous Tourism Barometer (SITB), community participation, empowerment, economic and socio-cultural sustainability are found to be the main influencing dimensions of sustainability of the Mah Meri ethnic group. However, natural resources, financial resources and environmental sustainability indicated weaker relationships in explaining sustainability of the Mah Meri ethnic group. Based on the SITB, the results demonstrate that the Mah Meri ethnic group are a "potential sustainable" tourism stakeholder.

Examining the Conflicting Relationship between U.S. National Parks and Host Communities: Understanding a Community’s Diverging Perspectives

“…Thus, decisions about resource management were commonly made by a few powerful groups. More recently, studies [33][34][35] have called for the importance of acknowledging marginal stakeholders (e.g., racial minorities, socially disadvantaged groups, and underrepresented individuals or groups) within decision-making processes for resource management. While perspectives of these groups are commonly not in line with the views of influential groups, an inclusive approach highlights the former groups' differing views and concerns about the local resources [36].…”

Multi-Criteria, Cost-Benefit, and Life-Cycle Analyses for Decision-Making to Support Responsible, Sustainable, and Alternative Tourism

“…Several innovative methodologies have been suggested to develop synthetic indicators. For example, Kunasekaran et al [79] considered many environmental and cultural indicators (i.e., 11 dimensions) to measure three constructs (i.e., community resources, community development, and sustainable tourism), but these were based on stakeholder perceptions. Several of the papers in Table 4 discussed environmental impacts, but they were based on single indicators such as the carbon footprint or ecological footprint.…”

“…Tanguay et al [75] describe the most popular indicators. Mikulic et al [76], Bhuiyan et al [77], Romero-Padilla et al [78], Kunasekaran et al [79], and Mutana and Mukwada [80] discuss various indices based on indicators.…”

Volunteer Tourism as a Sustainable Form of Tourism—The Case of Organized Events

“…Sustainability becomes a key challenge in developing quality tourism products without negatively affecting the natural and cultural environment that maintains and takes care of them [51]. Accentuating only one aspect (economic growth) is one of the main contemporary obstacles to making tourism more sustainable and enabling qualitative destination development [52].…”