Optical Manufacturing and Testing VII 2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.753832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring surface slope error on precision aspheres

Abstract: Optical designers are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of specifying and tolerancing slope errors on optical surfaces, especially aspheric surfaces. Slope errors can degrade system optical performance -in some cases even if the peak to valley surface figure errors meets the optical design tolerance analysis. With this awareness, more optical engineers are putting requirements for peak surface slope on optical element drawings. This puts pressure on optical fabricators to understand slope specifica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often inadequate tolerances are discovered "the hard way"; that is after all the manufactured optical components are assembled but the completed optical system fails to perform to its overall optical performance specifications. Some published examples include a 300x zoom system that needed a tolerance on local slope for key aspheric elements [4], optics for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) laser system that required power-spectral density (PSD) specifications [5], and wide-field aspheric camera lens suffering from localized artifacts in the center of the lens [6]. Surface form errors of the sort shown in figures 5 and 6 are often termed "mid-spatial frequency" (MSF) errors, and PV irregularity will often be…”
Section: Discussion Of Estimator Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often inadequate tolerances are discovered "the hard way"; that is after all the manufactured optical components are assembled but the completed optical system fails to perform to its overall optical performance specifications. Some published examples include a 300x zoom system that needed a tolerance on local slope for key aspheric elements [4], optics for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) laser system that required power-spectral density (PSD) specifications [5], and wide-field aspheric camera lens suffering from localized artifacts in the center of the lens [6]. Surface form errors of the sort shown in figures 5 and 6 are often termed "mid-spatial frequency" (MSF) errors, and PV irregularity will often be…”
Section: Discussion Of Estimator Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These midspatial frequency surface errors can lead to reduced system resolution, stray light, reduced uniformity of the illumination system, and so on [25]. Therefore the influence of midspatial frequency surface errors on the ASPALs needs to be considered besides the surface irregularities characterized by PV and RMS [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Consideration Of Mid-spatial Frequency Surface Errors For Aspalmentioning
confidence: 99%