2006
DOI: 10.1177/0273475306293359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Student Expectations and Their Effects on Satisfaction: The Importance of Managing Student Expectations

Abstract: Two studies investigate the relationship between student expectations and student satisfaction. Can students’ satisfaction with a course be accurately predicted by comparing their perceptions to their expectations (as suggested by the expectancy/disconfirmation paradigm)? The results of these studies suggest that the answer to this question is strongly affected by the method used to measure student expectations. When recalled expectations and current perceptions are measured together at the end of a term, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
129
0
16

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
129
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, expectations of students are high and include, for example, flexibility and choice in the delivery of education, and a two way communication process between themselves and the university (Davies, 2002). Due to this increase in expectations it is possible that the actual performance of the higher educational institutes is below the expectations of the students, resulting in dissatisfaction (Appleton- Knapp & Krentler, 2006;Bitner & Hubbert, 1994). Important to note is that the observed results are very robust.…”
Section: Conclusion Further Research and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this context, expectations of students are high and include, for example, flexibility and choice in the delivery of education, and a two way communication process between themselves and the university (Davies, 2002). Due to this increase in expectations it is possible that the actual performance of the higher educational institutes is below the expectations of the students, resulting in dissatisfaction (Appleton- Knapp & Krentler, 2006;Bitner & Hubbert, 1994). Important to note is that the observed results are very robust.…”
Section: Conclusion Further Research and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This exercise could help professors adjust unrealistic expectations and review learning objectives. At the end of term, professors could examine if the course has met the goals of the course (Appleton- Knapp and Krentler, 2006). This procedure could also be beneficial for reducing the probability of students experiencing dissatisfactory studentprofessor encounters.…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Appleton- Knapp & Krentler (2006) suggest that students' satisfaction with their educational experience should be a desired outcome, in addition to learning and knowing what attributes of professors are desired by students, may improve the overall education process (Faranda & Clarke, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%