2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0029229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring student engagement among elementary students: Pilot of the Student Engagement Instrument—Elementary Version.

Abstract: Early school withdrawal, commonly referred to as dropout, is associated with a plethora of negative outcomes for students, schools, and society. Student engagement, however, presents as a promising theoretical model and cornerstone of school completion interventions. The purpose of the present study was to validate the Student Engagement Instrument-Elementary Version (SEI-E). The psychometric properties of this measure were assessed based on the responses of an ethnically diverse sample of 1,943 students from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
44
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it would be desirable to confirm our findings in a sample of students from other school levels. Thirdly, our analyses are based on the students' selfreported disengagement, which means that the predictive validity of the measurement of students' school engagement may have been influenced by the sample characteristics as well as by other proximal and distal factors of academic outcomes (Carter et al 2012). Although self-reported assessment is common for research on school engagement (Fredricks and McColskey 2012), a combination of assessment instruments, including teacher ratings, interviews, and observation, should be used in further studies to avoid the limitation of the self-reported measurement.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it would be desirable to confirm our findings in a sample of students from other school levels. Thirdly, our analyses are based on the students' selfreported disengagement, which means that the predictive validity of the measurement of students' school engagement may have been influenced by the sample characteristics as well as by other proximal and distal factors of academic outcomes (Carter et al 2012). Although self-reported assessment is common for research on school engagement (Fredricks and McColskey 2012), a combination of assessment instruments, including teacher ratings, interviews, and observation, should be used in further studies to avoid the limitation of the self-reported measurement.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although engagement is relatively diverse in its definitions and coverage, researchers have reached a consensus that the construct is multidimensional and encompasses different aspects (e.g., behavioural, cognitive, and emotional), operating together to reflect students' positive approach to learning Carter et al, 2012;Fredricks et al, 2004;Phan, 2014b;Schaufeli et al, 2002;Upadyaya & Salmela-Aro, 2013). However, researchers have consistently disagreed on the types and number of the dimensions of engagement Fredricks et al, 2004;Li & Lerner, 2011;Schaufeli et al, 2002).…”
Section: Dimensions Of Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emotional engagement dimension reflects both the positive and negative reactions to teachers' instructions, classmates and school, perceptions of school belonging, and beliefs about the value of schooling. Finally, behavioural engagement is defined in terms of student's participation in classroom tasks, conduct, and participation in school-related extracurricular activities (see also Carter et al 2012;Sheppard, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%