2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring structural–functional correspondence: Spatial variability of specialised brain regions after macro-anatomical alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
283
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
283
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensive efforts have gone into improving brain atlases and the associated registration methods. For cerebral cortex, surface-based registration (SBR) and surface-based atlases have inherent advantages over conventional, volume-based registration because they respect the topology of the cortical sheet (Anticevic et al 2008;Fischl et al 1999;Frost and Goebel 2012;Tucholka et al 2012;Van Essen et al 2012c). Until recently, the available methods for SBR have used shape cues related to the folding pattern to constrain the registration from individuals to the atlas.…”
Section: Convolutions and Folding Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive efforts have gone into improving brain atlases and the associated registration methods. For cerebral cortex, surface-based registration (SBR) and surface-based atlases have inherent advantages over conventional, volume-based registration because they respect the topology of the cortical sheet (Anticevic et al 2008;Fischl et al 1999;Frost and Goebel 2012;Tucholka et al 2012;Van Essen et al 2012c). Until recently, the available methods for SBR have used shape cues related to the folding pattern to constrain the registration from individuals to the atlas.…”
Section: Convolutions and Folding Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the human brain is characterized by striking interindividual variability in structure and function (Frost and Goebel, 2012;Hasnain et al, 1998;Sugiura et al, 2007;Van Essen and Dierker, 2007;Xiong et al, 2000;. In the past two decades, dramatic interindividual variability has been observed in both sulcal/gyral patterns and anatomical features (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a relationship between an anatomical landmark and a functional area is certainly less clear in non primary cortical areas as observed for instance by Tahmasebi et al (Tahmasebi et al, 2012) for early stages versus cognitively higher levels of auditory processing. The generalization of our results is then limited because spatial location of functional area may vary greatly across subjects within a cortical area (Frost and Goebel, 2012) and due to the use of possible individual strategy for high-level tasks. Note that despite the improvement in spatial resolution and functional alignment, we failed to separate the differential activation resulting from different movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%