2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring stream habitat conditions: Can remote sensing substitute for field data?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Habitat Integrity Index (HII) indirectly measures variations in habitat structure related to the stream's degree of conservation [18][19][20]. The relationship between the HII and Gerromorpha communities is well known in communities from the Cerrado [15,24,25], the Amazon Forest [16,21], and other biomes such as the Atlantic Forest, as shown by Brasil et al [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Habitat Integrity Index (HII) indirectly measures variations in habitat structure related to the stream's degree of conservation [18][19][20]. The relationship between the HII and Gerromorpha communities is well known in communities from the Cerrado [15,24,25], the Amazon Forest [16,21], and other biomes such as the Atlantic Forest, as shown by Brasil et al [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the HII is appropriate to predict the distribution of different taxonomic groups such as aquatic insects of the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Odonata, and Heteroptera orders [18]. The HII has also been shown to be more suitable than other landscape metrics to predict the distribution of Heteroptera insects in anthropized gradients [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, a number of stream classification models developed for parts of the AW [4] or include the AW [5,7,8,31] use geospatial predictors that characterize climatic, physiographic, geologic, and land cover controls at the scales larger than an assessment reach. Measures collected remotely and/or calculated from spatially and temporally coarse datasets may not be able to capture variation at smaller scales that can be captured by reachscale field measurements [73]. However, it is likely that physical controls of streamflow duration within stream reaches are best represented by a combination of watershed and local reach-scale factors that describe the dynamic balance between flow sources and losses from infiltration and evapotranspiration [10].…”
Section: Indicators Used In the Beta Sdam Aw Have A Strong Conceptual...mentioning
confidence: 99%