2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00108-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring step kinematic variability on an instrumented treadmill: how many steps are enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
114
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, if measures of gait dynamics are going to find a home in clinical settings, work needs to be done to develop age-dependent norms and confidence intervals, to establish guidelines and procedures for standardization, and to identify practical ways of measuring gait fluctuations in clinical settings. As an example, to some degree, measures of variability depend on and become more robust as the length of the recording and the time series length increases (Owings & Grabiner, 2003). Yet, in studies reporting measures of gait variability, we find a wide range in the number of strides examined; some investigators base their measures on less than ten strides while others measure over hundreds of strides, even when quantifying the same aspects of the stride-to-stride fluctuations.…”
Section: Future Directions and Summarymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, if measures of gait dynamics are going to find a home in clinical settings, work needs to be done to develop age-dependent norms and confidence intervals, to establish guidelines and procedures for standardization, and to identify practical ways of measuring gait fluctuations in clinical settings. As an example, to some degree, measures of variability depend on and become more robust as the length of the recording and the time series length increases (Owings & Grabiner, 2003). Yet, in studies reporting measures of gait variability, we find a wide range in the number of strides examined; some investigators base their measures on less than ten strides while others measure over hundreds of strides, even when quantifying the same aspects of the stride-to-stride fluctuations.…”
Section: Future Directions and Summarymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, factors such as whether these gait cycles were collected continuously or not and using a treadmill or not, all influence the outcome in different ways. Although the use of a treadmill allows a considerable number of strides to be measured, a necessary requirement to gain reliable and precise estimates of linear [102] as well as nonlinear variability [38], walking over treadmill is known to differ from walking over ground [103,104]. Studies that incorporated pressure walkways often measured multiple runs to record sufficient strides in order to obtain precise and reliable estimates of variability, thus making these protocols non-continuous.…”
Section: Sources Of Heterogeneity Among Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the long trial, the middle 200 strides were analyzed to attain adequate precision [16,17], and for the short bouts trial, the middle eight strides were analyzed to ensure steady state gait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both variability and local dynamic stability are sensitive to aging and appear to be affected in fallers [7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, the relationship between these measures and fall risk has been established only under laboratory conditions, where continuous data series exceeding 200 strides are required for precise estimation [16,17]. For clinical use and ambulatory assessment, it is questionable whether it is feasible to collect datasets containing such large numbers of consecutive strides; hence their estimation based on short bouts of gait would be preferable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%