2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:sola.0000031378.29215.0c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Stellar Differential rotation with asteroseismology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also find evidence of differential rotation, and show that independent measurements of the star inclination will be of great help in inferring the rate of differential rotation. Spot modeling may then achieve complementary results to asteroseismology (Gizon & Solanki 2004;Ballot et al 2006). A dedicated analysis of differential rotation will be presented in a forthcoming work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also find evidence of differential rotation, and show that independent measurements of the star inclination will be of great help in inferring the rate of differential rotation. Spot modeling may then achieve complementary results to asteroseismology (Gizon & Solanki 2004;Ballot et al 2006). A dedicated analysis of differential rotation will be presented in a forthcoming work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this method was used for single Kepler light curves (Frasca et al 2011;Fröhlich et al 2012) where DR is the favorite explanation for the light curve shape. Asteroseismology provides another approach, explaining frequency splitting of global oscillations in terms of different latitudinal rotation rates (Gizon & Solanki 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for white dwarfs (Kawaler et al 1999), solar-type stars (Gizon & Solanki 2004), and B stars (Suárez et al 2007) using rotationally split frequencies of stellar oscillations. A&A 542, A116 (2012) Stellar differential rotation cannot be observed directly since the surface of stars can usually not be imaged with sufficient resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%