2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring soil water content through volume/mass replacement using a constant volume container

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This measurement was repeated after all irrigation treatments and major precipitation events. Both methods (volumetric measurements and oven-drying) were used to measure total soil moisture as described by Ma et al (2016) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This measurement was repeated after all irrigation treatments and major precipitation events. Both methods (volumetric measurements and oven-drying) were used to measure total soil moisture as described by Ma et al (2016) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement was repeated after all irrigation treatments and major precipitation events. Both methods (volumetric measurements and oven-drying) were used to measure total soil moisture as described by Ma et al (2016). For soil N content, soil sampling was done from each subplot at the depth of 0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80, and 80-100 cm for the estimation of before sowing soil N contents.…”
Section: Estimation Of Soil Moisture N Contents Biomass and Yield Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are widely used and their accuracy depends largely on the experience of the user, careful calibration and different soil properties. The thermo-gravimetric method can be a good tool to calibrate these devices, although due to the time and oven requirements, the calibration process is slow but extremely accurate (Ma et al, 2016;Placidi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, researchers only collected partial runoff due to the tedious work, which inevitably resulted in errors caused by changes in sediment concentrations. More speculatively, drying period varied from one soil to another due to different implementations of the gravimetric method could favor the dynamic of relative errors (Ban et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2016). The relative error for sediment concentrations between the two methods averaged 4.82%, suggesting that the averaged accuracy of the instrument was greater than 95%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%