Measuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: results from the eight-country MAL-ED study

Abstract

BackgroundThere is no standardized approach to comparing socioeconomic status (SES) across multiple sites in epidemiological studies. This is particularly problematic when cross-country comparisons are of interest. We sought to develop a simple measure of SES that would perform well across diverse, resource-limited settings.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 800 children aged 24 to 60 months across eight resource-limited settings. Parents were asked to respond to a household SES questionnaire, and the height of each child was measured. A statistical analysis was done in two phases. First, the best approach for selecting and weighting household assets as a proxy for wealth was identified. We compared four approaches to measuring wealth: maternal education, principal components analysis, Multidimensional Poverty Index, and a novel variable selection approach based on the use of random forests. Second, the selected wealth measure was combined with other relevant variables to form a more complete measure of household SES. We used child height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) as the outcome of interest.ResultsMean age of study children was 41 months, 52% were boys, and 42% were stunted. Using cross-validation, we found that random forests yielded the lowest prediction error when selecting assets as a measure of household wealth. The final SES index included access to improved water and sanitation, eight selected assets, maternal education, and household income (the WAMI index). A 25% difference in the WAMI index was positively associated with a difference of 0.38 standard deviations in HAZ (95% CI 0.22 to 0.55).ConclusionsStatistical learning methods such as random forests provide an alternative to principal components analysis in the development of SES scores. Results from this multicountry study demonstrate the validity of a simplified SES index. With further validation, this simplified index may provide a standard approach for SES adjustment across resource-limited settings.

Use of antibiotics in children younger than two years in eight countries: a prospective cohort study

“…Socioeconomic status was described using the child’s average score on the WAMI index based on: household access to improved water and sanitation; wealth measured by eight household assets; mother’s education; and monthly household income 39 . Crowding was defined as the mean number of people per room.…”

Vaccine coverage and adherence to EPI schedules in eight resource poor settings in the MAL-ED cohort study

“…Student’s t -tests and tests to compare two proportions were used to compare fully vaccinated versus non-fully vaccinated children for overall socioeconomic status (the Water/sanitation, Assets, Maternal education and Income [WAMI] index) [17], and factors including household income in US dollars, maternal age, years of maternal education, number of siblings in the household, sex, whether the child was first born, and place of delivery. Proportions tests were used to examine timeliness of vaccination; age at the first dose of BCG, DPT, OPV, or measles were indicators for schedule adherence.…”

Developing a socioeconomic index for health research in Iraq

“…The difficulty arises from the fact that SES is not a single variable like height or weight that can be easily measured. SES is the result of the interaction of many variables, which are themselves difficult to measure, such as income, wealth and occupation (6,(8)(9)(10)(11). This is especially problematic for health researchers who are not specialized in social sciences and just want a relatively accurate yet easyto-calculate method to measure SES in their study (12).…”

“…This number will be even more useful if it is on a numerical scale; then it would be more amenable to robust statistical analysis (6,8,9,11).…”