1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00845384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring social support: A synthesis of current approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A lot of studies reported the negative correlations between psychological/physical symptoms and the social support measures (Bruhn & Philips, 1984). The results of this study also showed social support had the significant negative correlations with symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A lot of studies reported the negative correlations between psychological/physical symptoms and the social support measures (Bruhn & Philips, 1984). The results of this study also showed social support had the significant negative correlations with symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This included specific questions about the patient's perceptions of the impact on haemodialysis, and a scries of questions allowing a global rating of social support on a 1-5 scale. The social support measure incorporated emotional as well as practi cal support (both related to and independent of dialysis), giving attention to the reciprocity of support [32,33]. Past psychiatric histo ry was also elicited during the interview, and confirmed by referring to the medical case notes.…”
Section: Psychosocial Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support that occurs in the context of a conflicted relationship is associated with increased negative psychological symptoms, and a stronger relationship between stress and symptoms (Sandler & Barrera, 1984). Support that is received but not reciprocated is hypothesized to reduce its protective effects (e.g., Bruhn & Philips, 1984). Thus, the results of the present study add to a growing body of literature that delineates the conditions in which the receipt of social support may have adverse effects on the recipient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%