2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2019.100016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring smoking prevalence in a middle income nation: An examination of the 100 cigarettes lifetime screen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, smoking prevalence was assessed based on how people used 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes. Such a definition for the smoking status, according to Levy et al [ 25 ], may have important implications for the smoking population size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, smoking prevalence was assessed based on how people used 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes. Such a definition for the smoking status, according to Levy et al [ 25 ], may have important implications for the smoking population size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, applying the screen did not improve model validation for nondaily smokers. A recent study [ 3 ] observed that Mexico’s nondaily smoking prevalence without the 100-cigarettes screen for ages 15–24 was nearly 70% greater than with the screen, and differences were observed even among older age groups. Similar variations using the 100-cigarettes screen have been observed in a US study [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous Mexico SimSmoke [ 11 , 12 ], we limited the modeling exercise to established smokers, restricted to those who reported that they had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime [ 3 , 15 ]. However, because a large percentage of both daily and especially nondaily smokers, including older adults, reported that they have not smoked 100 cigarettes in their lifetime [ 3 ], we do not apply the 100-cigarette criterion for the current model. Instead, we conduct a sensitivity analysis applying that criterion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, large social media campaigns have accompanied the launch of IQOS [28], which could have resulted in further online information sharing and seeking [36] and boosting of ideas to mislead consumers about HTPs safety, especially when the evidence is inconclusive about it [37][38][39][40]. As IQOS and other HTPs enter and are marketed in Mexico, awareness and use will certainly increase, as it has in other countries [5,6,24], yet market growth for this tobacco product segment needs to be studied for Mexico, where smoking frequency is significantly lower than in other populations around the world [31,32,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%