Measuring Sleep in Vulnerable Older Adults: A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Sleep Measures

Abstract

Objectives This study compared subjective (questionnaire) and objective (actigraphy) sleep assessments, and examined agreement between these methods, in vulnerable older adults participating in a Veterans Administration Adult Day Health Care (ADHC) program. Methods 59 ADHC participants (95% male, mean age = 78 years) completed sleep questionnaires and 72 continuous hours of wrist actigraphy. Linear regression was used to examine agreement between methods and explore discrepancies in subjective/objective measures. Results Disturbed sleep was common, yet there was no agreement between subjective and objective sleep assessment methods. Compared with objective measures, one-half of participants reported worse sleep efficiency (SE) on questionnaires while one-quarter over-estimated SE. Participants reporting worse pain had a greater discrepancy between subjective and objective SE. Conclusions Vulnerable older adults demonstrated unique patterns of reporting sleep quality when comparing subjective and objective methods. Additional research is needed to better understand how vulnerable older adults evaluate sleep problems. Clinical Implications Objective and subjective sleep measures may represent unique and equally important constructs in this population. Clinicians should consider utilizing both objective and subjective sleep measures to identify individuals who may benefit from behavioral sleep treatments, and future research is needed to develop and validate appropriate sleep assessments for vulnerable older adults.

CBT for late‐life insomnia and the accuracy of sleep and wake perceptions: Results from a randomized‐controlled trial

“…First, our objective measure of sleep, actigraphy, is more accurately defined as a method for estimating sleep and wake based on limb movement. However, actigraphy has been validated against PSG (Marino et al., ; Martin & Hakim, ), and is commonly used in the investigation of sleep misperception (Hughes et al., ; Tang & Harvey, , ; Van Den Berg et al., ; Williams, Kay, Rowe, & McCrae, ; Williams et al., ). However, it is important to recognize that actigraphy may not capture the full spectrum of nightly sleep and wakefulness behaviour that could contribute to sleep discrepancy (e.g.…”

Objective Sleep Duration in Older Adults: Results From The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing

“…Self‐reported sleep measures are the most commonly used method in large‐scale surveys . However, these may measure different sleep parameters than objective measurement . Alternative objective methods, such as accelerometry, are becoming increasingly common .…”

“…2 However, these may measure different sleep parameters than objective measurement. 15 Alternative objective methods, such as accelerometry, are becoming increasingly common. 16 Technological advances and access to cost-effective, user-friendly, noninvasive measurement devices, such as wrist-worn monitors, have made it feasible for large, community-based population studies to incorporate accelerometry measurement.…”

Social Psychological Predictors of Sleep Hygiene Behaviors in Australian and Hong Kong University Students

“…Self-report measurement limitations also need to be taken into account when interpreting the findings, which may be susceptible to social desirability and recall bias. It has been suggested, however, that both objective and subjective measures are equally important for sleep research, as they represent unique and equally significant constructs for sleep studies [59]. Also, due to university policy and resource constraint, the recruitment methods (i.e., online-versus paper-based questionnaires) and incentive structures were different between the two samples.…”