2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring shot peening media velocity by indent size comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Roughness is higher in the case of SP because the impingement of high-velocity shot particles generates overlapping microindentations on the surface (see Nordin and Alfredsson (2016)). In VP, roughness is relatively lower as it involves both the peening and burnishing effect.…”
Section: Surface Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Roughness is higher in the case of SP because the impingement of high-velocity shot particles generates overlapping microindentations on the surface (see Nordin and Alfredsson (2016)). In VP, roughness is relatively lower as it involves both the peening and burnishing effect.…”
Section: Surface Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 from shot peening at low coverage with indents made at known velocities. The determination procedure for media velocity is described by Nordin and Alfredsson [56]. Single particles were shot against a plate (same manufacturing Table 5 shows the Almen A intensity, the corresponding mean indent area and estimated velocity for the present shot peening.…”
Section: Media Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gari茅py et al (2017) estimated the distribution of shot velocity using the distribution of the size of the resultant indentations and performing numerical analysis on the residual stress. Nordin and Alfredsson (2016) used the indentation size to estimate the shot velocity and showed that the estimated shot velocity agreed with the measured values for small diameter shots. Guechichi et al (2013) clarified the relation between the peening strength measured using an Almen strip and the shot velocity for shot with an identical diameter and shot material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%