2015
DOI: 10.1037/a0037584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring sexual aggression perpetration in college men: A comparison of two measures.

Abstract: Objective The present study was designed to provide a comparison of rates of self-reported sexual aggression perpetration obtained using two different measures – a version of the Sexual Experiences Survey (SES; Abbey et al, 2007; Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987) and the Sexual Strategies Scale (SSS, Strang, et al, 2013; Struckman-Johnson, Struckman-Johnson, & Anderson, 2003). We also examined the psychometric structure of each measure using Rasch model item analysis (Rasch, 1966). Method Two equivalent coho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, participants are asked, “Which of the following have you used to convince a woman to have sex (oral/anal/vaginal) with you when she did not want to?” followed by items such as “blocking her if she tries to leave the room” (classified as physical force), “getting her drunk/high” (classified as use of intoxication) and “telling her lies” (classified as verbal coercion). The SSS has been shown to result in higher rates of reported sexual coercion when compared with other measures of sexual aggression history (Strang et al, 2013; Testa, Hoffman, Lucke, & Pagnan, 2015). This is likely due to the fact that SSS uses less legalistic language than other measures and thus is less likely to invoke socially desirable responding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, participants are asked, “Which of the following have you used to convince a woman to have sex (oral/anal/vaginal) with you when she did not want to?” followed by items such as “blocking her if she tries to leave the room” (classified as physical force), “getting her drunk/high” (classified as use of intoxication) and “telling her lies” (classified as verbal coercion). The SSS has been shown to result in higher rates of reported sexual coercion when compared with other measures of sexual aggression history (Strang et al, 2013; Testa, Hoffman, Lucke, & Pagnan, 2015). This is likely due to the fact that SSS uses less legalistic language than other measures and thus is less likely to invoke socially desirable responding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This variable was assessed using a 16-item version of the Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) that measures unwanted contact, attempted intercourse, and intercourse using verbal, physical force, and incapacitation tactics Testa et al, 2015a). Men were asked how many times they had done each behavior over the past semester (never, once, or 2 or more times).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the SES-SFP has been available since 2007, little research has examined its psychometric properties. Testa et al, (2015) found evidence of structural validity in a sample of college students. Another study examined the construct validity of the SES-Long Form Perpetration, focusing on whether participant descriptions of their own behavior matched their answers on the SES-LFP (Buday & Peterson, 2015).…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the Ses-sfpmentioning
confidence: 95%