2003
DOI: 10.1097/01202412-200305000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring secondary deformities of the shoulder in children with obstetric brachial plexus lesion: reliability of three methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, future 3D studies with larger populations may want to investigate evaluating subsections of the glenoid or adding more categories (e.g., a flat glenoid) to provide further clinical insights. The 2D measures of concavity from both planes had similar reliability to past studies 16,17 but were below that of the current 3D measures.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Glenohumeral Deformities In Obppcontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, future 3D studies with larger populations may want to investigate evaluating subsections of the glenoid or adding more categories (e.g., a flat glenoid) to provide further clinical insights. The 2D measures of concavity from both planes had similar reliability to past studies 16,17 but were below that of the current 3D measures.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Glenohumeral Deformities In Obppcontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…9,21,37,38 The relative percentage of convex glenoids in the current study was smaller than previously reported. 16 This difference likely arises from the fact that the current 3D measure is a quantitative measure derived from the entire glenoid surface, whereas previous 2D measures are qualitative and based on a single slice. Simplifying concavity into two 3D categories (concave vs. convex) allowed for a more direct comparison with past 2D studies.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Glenohumeral Deformities In Obppmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations