2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7720-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Retinal Function in the Mouse

Abstract: Electroretinography is a crucial assay for studying the function and the functional integrity of the retina. The mouse is an important animal model for studying the retinal neurons and circuitries. In addition, it is often used as animal model for human retinal disorders. Therefore, a good understanding of the procedures in animal handling, of the methods for data analysis and of the requirements for stimulators and for the data acquisition equipment is of importance. Here, the currently most common methods an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the electroretinogram to measure retinal function of wild-type and P23H-3 rats (n ≥ 10) at P18, P30, P60, and P90, as described previously (Jobling et al, 2013;Vessey et al, 2015;Von Eisenhart-Rothe et al, 2018). There are a number of different ways of using the electroretinogram to measure rod and cone mediated responses (Kremers and Tanimoto, 2018). We used a paired flash paradigm to assess rod and cone mediated responses; the first light stimulus elicits a mixed rod and cone mediated waveform, whereas the second light stimulus elicits a cone-only response.…”
Section: Retinal Function Using Electroretinographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the electroretinogram to measure retinal function of wild-type and P23H-3 rats (n ≥ 10) at P18, P30, P60, and P90, as described previously (Jobling et al, 2013;Vessey et al, 2015;Von Eisenhart-Rothe et al, 2018). There are a number of different ways of using the electroretinogram to measure rod and cone mediated responses (Kremers and Tanimoto, 2018). We used a paired flash paradigm to assess rod and cone mediated responses; the first light stimulus elicits a mixed rod and cone mediated waveform, whereas the second light stimulus elicits a cone-only response.…”
Section: Retinal Function Using Electroretinographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study sought to further define visual phenotypes in this model. We used recording of the electroretinogram (ERG) to probe retinal function 30 , 31 , and optokinetic responses (OKR) to assess not only retinal, but also in part post-retinal processing 32 35 . Both tests were performed under both scotopic (rod-dominated) and photopic (cone-dominated) conditions, in order to probe preferentially rod- versus cone-driven pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of visual function, we performed electrophysiological tests on the day after sonication by using full-field and flicker ERGs providing an insight into the physiology and integrity of the retina [ 31 ] by discriminating the differential functions of photoreceptors (rods and cones) and bipolar cells. We did not observe any difference in the scotopic or photopic responses compared to the control contralateral eyes, supporting the functional safety of sonication at 0.15 MPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%