Measuring Resource Inequality: The Gini Coefficient

Abstract

This paper stems from work done by the authors at the Mathematics for Social Justice Workshop held in June of 2007 at Middlebury College. We provide a description of the Gini coefficient and some discussion of how it can be used to promote quantitative literacy skills in mathematics courses. The Gini Coefficient was introduced in 1921 by Italian statistician Corrado Gini as a measure of inequality. It is defined as twice the area between two curves. One, the Lorenz curve for a given population with respect to a given resource, represents the cumulative percentage of the resource as a function of the cumulative percentage of the population that shares that percentage of the resource. The second curve is the line y = x which is the Lorenz curve for a population which shares the resource equally. The Gini coefficient can be interpreted as the percentage of inequality represented in the population with respect to the given resource. We propose that the Gini coefficient can be used to enhance students' understanding of calculus concepts and provide practice for students in using both calculus and quantitative literacy skills. Our examples are based mainly on distribution of energy resources using publicly available data from the Energy Information Agency of the United States Government. For energy resources within the United States, we find that by household, the Gini coefficient is 0.346, while using the 51 data points represented by the states and Washington D.C., the Gini coefficient is 0.158. When we consider the countries of the world as a population of 210, the Gini coefficient is 0.670. We close with ideas for questions which can be posed to students and discussion of the experiences two other mathematics instructors have had incorporating the Gini coefficient into pre-calculus-level mathematics classes.

Evaluating the outcomes associated with an innovative change in a state-level transportation project prioritization process: A case study of Vermont

“…Countries that have a Gini coefficient above 0.4 are considered to have a relatively high degree of income inequality, while countries that have a Gini coefficient somewhere between 0.2 and 0.35 are considered to have a relatively equal distribution of income. The Gini coefficient for the world as a whole is about 0.65 (Catalano et al, 2009). Obviously, the coefficient is highly dependent on how the population is selected.…”

Inequality of Carbon Intensity: Empirical Analysis of China 2000–2014

“…Standard application of the Gini coefficient is to show income distribution across groups through time [45]. Recently, the Gini coefficient has been extended to measure disproportionality in energy resources [46], inequality in plant size or fecundity, as well as spatial distributions of different land types [39]. With the increasing prominence of carbon equity, carbon Gini coefficient as an effective measurement tool for the equality of carbon emissions has been widely applied in recent years [23,29,47].…”

Spatial Pattern Analysis of Regional Water Use Profile Based on the Gini Coefficient and Location Quotient

“…Considering the usefulness of the Gini coefficient and location quotient in the analysis of the spatial distribution of some regional elements, it is necessary to explore the possibility of their application to optimize the water use profile. The Gini coefficient, invented by the Italian statistician Corado Gini in 1912, is recognized as a measure of equality in the distribution of income in a given society (Catalano et al ). Because of its easy interpretability, the coefficient was developed substantially for use in economics and has been applied more widely in other research fields (White ; Norheim ; Zheng et al ).…”