2017
DOI: 10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.1-2.0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Racial Bias and General Education Assessment

Abstract: In this article we discuss a model for assessing general education student learning outcomes related to reducing racial bias in postsecondary students. As many postsecondary institutions do, our institution attempts to address racial bias through our general education curriculum, but it is difficult to assess improvement in this area. We used the Color-Blind Racial Attitude Scale (CoBRAS) assessment tool to analyze changes in racial bias as a general education student outcome. Results of a linear regression mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students taking both a GA and a USC course had significantly lower (improved) racial bias scores (47.30, p = 0.000, Cohen's d = 0.857 indicating a large effect size) than their matched peers who did not participate in either (61.14). For science/business/math/computer science majors, there was an even larger difference (41.82 vs. 66.82 respectively; p = 0.020; Cohen's d = 1.555 indicating a very large effect size) compared to other majors (Blankenberger et al, 2017).…”
Section: Results: Why the Different Approaches Matteredmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Students taking both a GA and a USC course had significantly lower (improved) racial bias scores (47.30, p = 0.000, Cohen's d = 0.857 indicating a large effect size) than their matched peers who did not participate in either (61.14). For science/business/math/computer science majors, there was an even larger difference (41.82 vs. 66.82 respectively; p = 0.020; Cohen's d = 1.555 indicating a very large effect size) compared to other majors (Blankenberger et al, 2017).…”
Section: Results: Why the Different Approaches Matteredmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Evaluating student outcomes is not easy, but it can help to conceptualize the process as a type of program evaluation (Blankenberger & Cantrell-Bruce, 2016;Blankenberger et al, 2017;Blankenberger, 2020;Cantrell-Bruce & Blankenberger, 2015). The classic systems theory model has been in use for decades in organizational theory and provides a model to aid those engaged in evaluations.…”
Section: Assessment Of Student Outcomes As Program Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations