Measuring Quality of Wireless Local Area Network Using Quality of Service Framewrok

Abstract

The internet has a very important role in education. Many activities are done through internet. AMIK DCC Bandar Lampung is an educational institution that uses the internet as one of the supporting facilities and infrastructures to manage and organize the data and information used by the student to find references about the lecture. There are three buildings on the main campus building A building B and C buildings, where each building using WLAN to deploy internet access. There are some complaints submitted by students related wireless network encourage researchers to study the quality of service WLAN. Thus the researchers wanted to analyze the Quality of Service WLAN networks in building A, building B, and C, in each floor. The method used in this research is Quality of Services (QoS). Where an analysis wireless network by four parameters. There are namely delay, packet lost, bandwidth, and throughput. The results of the measurement and monitoring of Quality of Service WLAN at AMIK DCC Bandar Lampung in building A, building B, C on each floor of the building can be classified in the category of good which value index is 3, and the factors that occurred in the signal range cannot cover every room in every building and have not good bandwidth management.

Performance Comparison of Zevenet Multi Service Load Balancing with Least Connection and Round Robin Algorithm

“…Based on the outcomes of these computations, the roundrobin algorithm's delay value is 23.3 ms, while the leastconnected algorithm's delay value is 40 ms. Based on the TIPHON standardization [45], the test results are included in the "Best" category. Nonetheless, the round-robin approach has the minimum delay value when comparing the delay values of the least-connection and round-robin algorithms.…”

“…The ability to ensure the transmission of crucial data is another way to define quality of service; put another way, it is a set of standards that establish how satisfied a customer is with a given service [42]- [44]. The extent of quality TIPHON's tables are used to adapt the network to Quality-of-Service requirements [45]. The network quality level categories for QOS based on TIPHON are grouped into Very Good, Good, Not Good, and Bad [45], Index Parameters Quality of Service (QOS) from TIPHON Table 2.…”

“…The extent of quality TIPHON's tables are used to adapt the network to Quality-of-Service requirements [45]. The network quality level categories for QOS based on TIPHON are grouped into Very Good, Good, Not Good, and Bad [45], Index Parameters Quality of Service (QOS) from TIPHON Table 2.…”

“…The delay calculation formula is found in Equation 2. TIPHON standard values for delay [45] are shown in Table 4. 3) Jitter: Jitter, often known as the discrepancy in packet arrival times at the destination terminal, is a variation of delay [48], [52].…”

“…Equation 4 is the formula for calculating packet loss. TIPHON standard value for packet loss [45] as demonstrated in Table 6.…”