2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000278162.82906.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments

Abstract: Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery are lacking. To demonstrate the benefits of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, future research to rigorously develop and validate new cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery-specific instruments is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
0
128
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…4,7,8,24,53 The prospective study design provided longitudinal data and the opportunity to compare the progress and evolution of outcomes in our patient sample with each patient acting as her own control. In addition, because we designed this study to obtain measurements at specified time intervals after breast reconstruction (3 weeks and 3 months), this approach avoided the potential bias inherent in assessing Hr-QOL at various lengths of time after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,7,8,24,53 The prospective study design provided longitudinal data and the opportunity to compare the progress and evolution of outcomes in our patient sample with each patient acting as her own control. In addition, because we designed this study to obtain measurements at specified time intervals after breast reconstruction (3 weeks and 3 months), this approach avoided the potential bias inherent in assessing Hr-QOL at various lengths of time after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recentemente, foi demonstrado que a assimetria da mama, medido pelo BCTOS, está significativamente relacionada com um mau funcionamento psicossocial após a CC 29 . Instrumentos genéricos podem desempenhar um papel complementar nos resultados relatados pelo pacientes, mas que não são suficientemente sensíveis para detectar a gama de alterações que ocorrem após cirurgias estéticas e reconstrutivas de mama 23 . O BREAST-Q é um instrumento específico para avaliação do paciente dos resultados em cirurgia estética e reconstrutiva da mama.…”
Section: Resultados Estéticosunclassified
“…A base psicométrica dos instrumentos utilizados no MBROS Body-Image Questionnaire incluiu dois questionários sobre a saúde relacionada à QV: o SF-36 e o FACT-B 56 . O BREAST-Q é um questionário elaborado para avaliar a satisfação e a QV relacionadas à cirurgia 23 . A BCTOS é uma escala designada para a avaliação subjetiva dos resultados estéticos e funcionais após o tratamento do câncer de mama 22 .…”
Section: Fact-b 44unclassified
“…Como señalamos al principio de este trabajo, se percibe su necesidad ya que distintos autores de habla española han usado instrumentos ad hoc (6) o instrumentos desarrollados en otros ámbitos y con otros fines, sin que se haya procedido a su adaptación lingüística o cultural (7) Aunque existen instrumentos específicos de CVRS para CP en el medio anglosajón desde fines del siglo pasado, su uso tampoco está demasiado difundido. Pusic (21) en una revisión realizada a finales de la década pasada encontró 227 instrumentos de CVRS usados en artículos en que se hacía investigación cualitativa en CP y/o Estética de la mama; de todos ellos, solo uno cumplía con los criterios de la Scientific Advisoty Committee del Medical Outcomes Trust for Health-Related Outcomes Measures sobre las cualidades psicométricas que estos instrumentos deben exhibir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified