2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2008.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes of CPA firms prior to, and following the Sarbanes–Oxley Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have analyzed whether changes in accounting systems, regulations, and environments increase or decrease the productivity or efficiency of accounting firms (Banker, Chang, & Cunningham, 2003;Banker, Chang, & Natarajan, 2005;Banker, Chang, & Natarajan, 2007;Chang, Choy, Cooper, & Parker, 2009a;Chang, Choy, Cooper, & Parker, 2009b;Chang, Huang, & Kuo, 2015;Hwang, Kang, & Hur, 2015;Hwang, Kim, & Jeon, 2005;Lee & Kim, 2001). Lee and Kim (2001) analyzed the relationship between the human resources input and revenue of Korean accounting firms from 1997 to 1999 by using a Cobb-Douglas production function.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies have analyzed whether changes in accounting systems, regulations, and environments increase or decrease the productivity or efficiency of accounting firms (Banker, Chang, & Cunningham, 2003;Banker, Chang, & Natarajan, 2005;Banker, Chang, & Natarajan, 2007;Chang, Choy, Cooper, & Parker, 2009a;Chang, Choy, Cooper, & Parker, 2009b;Chang, Huang, & Kuo, 2015;Hwang, Kang, & Hur, 2015;Hwang, Kim, & Jeon, 2005;Lee & Kim, 2001). Lee and Kim (2001) analyzed the relationship between the human resources input and revenue of Korean accounting firms from 1997 to 1999 by using a Cobb-Douglas production function.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist Index, Chang et al (2009b) compared the efficiency and productivity of 56 United States accounting firms before the introduction of SOX with those thereafter, and found that these firms enhanced their productivity after the introduction due to technological advances, but not to efficiency. In addition, Chang et al (2009a) found, by using data on 62 United States accounting firms, that the increase in productivity in the accounting industry was due to the increase in revenue from management advisory services. Later, Chang et al (2015) analyzed the productivity and technological efficiency of the United States, Chinese, and Taiwanese accounting firms for 2007 to 2009 by using a stochastic metafrontier production function.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang et al () investigate the productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change of the 56 largest CPA firms in the US between the period before (1996–1999) and the period after (2003–2006) the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX). They indicate that on average there was productivity growth of approximately 17% among CPA firms from the pre‐SOX period to the post‐SOX period.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the additional question investigated is whether the European regulation explains increases or decreases in productivity. The studies published on efficiency and productivity in accounting firms include those by Cheng et al (), Banker et al (, ), Chang et al (, ) and Lee ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao utilizar uma Análise de envelope de dados, Chang et al (2009) Nesse caso, a variável dependente não é livremente distribuída no intervalo de −∞ e +∞, mas sim entre 0 (zero) e 1 (um). Essa é exatamente a dificuldade que dever ser enfrentada no estudo, dado que o indicador de produtividade relativa dos ramos de atividade industrial calculado por meio da técnica DEA-CCR encontra-se dentro do intervalo entre 0 (zero) e 1 (um).…”
Section: Investimento Direto Estrangeiro E Produtividade: Uma Sínteseunclassified