2011
DOI: 10.1121/1.3531798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring positive and negative affect in the voiced sounds of African elephants (Loxodonta africana)

Abstract: As in other mammals, there is evidence that the African elephant voice reflects affect intensity, but it is less clear if positive and negative affective states are differentially reflected in the voice. An acoustic comparison was made between African elephant "rumble" vocalizations produced in negative social contexts (dominance interactions), neutral social contexts (minimal social activity), and positive social contexts (affiliative interactions) by four adult females housed at Disney's Animal Kingdom®. Rum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these differences may be attributed to differences between analysing only signature whistles (Esch, Sayigh, Blum, et al, 2009) and analysing the whole whistle repertoire (this study) or that arousal during different behavioural states and arousal due to stress induced by temporary capture are not entirely analogous. Another possible source of variance is that shifts in vocalization parameters can also be affected by the emotional valence of the context (Briefer, 2012;Soltis, Blowers, & Savage, 2011), something that could not be controlled in our study but warrants further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, these differences may be attributed to differences between analysing only signature whistles (Esch, Sayigh, Blum, et al, 2009) and analysing the whole whistle repertoire (this study) or that arousal during different behavioural states and arousal due to stress induced by temporary capture are not entirely analogous. Another possible source of variance is that shifts in vocalization parameters can also be affected by the emotional valence of the context (Briefer, 2012;Soltis, Blowers, & Savage, 2011), something that could not be controlled in our study but warrants further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This parameter, which is also easier to measure than FMextent, could thus be selected as a clear valence indicator in goats. A decrease in F0range from negative to positive situations has also been observed in humans (Hammerschmidt & Jürgens, 2007) and elephants, Loxodonta africana (Soltis et al, 2011). Similarly, lower variation in F0 (cumulative variation of F0) in positive than in negative situation has been found in dogs (Taylor, Reby, & McComb, 2009).…”
Section: Vocal Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Yet, changes in parameter values between neutral and negative situations are often easier to detect than between neutral and positive situations, because negative emotions often trigger higher arousal levels than positive ones . Another concern regarding research on indicators of emotions is that very few studies have investigated both arousal and valence in a given species (but see for example Gogoleva et al, 2010;Soltis, Blowers, & Savage, 2011). Additionally, the emotional situations that are used often differ in both dimensions simultaneously, or may differ in more than simply the emotions they trigger (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have made extensive use of such time-series analyses in our acoustics research on elephants (e.g. Soltis et al 2011) and employed those techniques here to examine this aspect of the data.…”
Section: Accelerometer Data Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the total acceleration data were transformed into acoustic (.wav) files in Adobe Audition (version 2.0, Adobe Systems), after which analyses were conducted in PRAAT (version 4.5.18; Boersma & Weenink 2007) using fully automated routines (see Soltis et al 2011 for examples of these techniques used on acoustic data). First, the signal was low-pass filtered at 5 Hz (Hanning window, 2 Hz smoothing), down-sampled to a 10 Hz sample rate, and a Fourier transform was performed.…”
Section: Accelerometer Data Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%